Monday, September 18, 2017

modernist painting & the painters of modern life II: manet's impressionism

AP art history notes on 19th century art
reading: the fetishism of the commodity- karl marx 
manet:
-"father" of impressionism
-skeptical of art's ability to communicate
-focuses on material & formal invention
-bohemian status
-attracted to outcasts of society

le dejeuner sur l'herbe (luncheon on the grass)- manet
1863
modernist medium specificity
deliberately problematic/unresolved
putting figures together of relations of non-relations
woman in back is too large for her position, closeness of hands
flatness to woman's flesh, blindingly white
brushstrokes not well integrated
sketchiness in landscape
shatters sense of separateness
weird bc naked woman isn't allegorical, just an every day woman
shown in the salon of the refused
sabotaged harmonizing values & clear unambiguous hierarchies
of classical renaissance order
COMPARE TO:
fete champetre- titian
c. 1510
young ladies on the banks of seine- courbet
1856-57 
almost romantic compared to manet's
looks like dolls/mannequin/corpse
_____________
olympia- manet
1863
flat
prostitute- outcast
stark flatness, blinding white highlighted by black outlines
lack of subtley
almost no chiascurro
flatness relates to print culture/illustration
cat at her feet instead of usual dog
flower in her hair = erotic
ribbon around her neck = presenting her body as a gift
african attendant = racist critiques
suggests she is a courtesan (escort, high class) -->
offensive to salon viewer; disguises class difference from clients,
pretending to be part of a higher class
unsubmissive & particular gaze
COMPARED TO:
venus of urbino- titian
1538
_____________
the old musician- manet
1862
figures seem disassociated, not interacting
COMPARED TO:
gilles- jean-antoine watteau
1718
sticker book quality
______________
the absinthe drinker- manet
1859
the ragpicker- manet
c. 1865-70
bum = outcast
music in the tuileries- manet
1862
draws out strangeness of everyday life, scenes of parisian leisure
many faces crudely sketched out
nothing in center of canvas
can see brushstrokes
social observation; frank/honest/unromanticized
daring gestures away from academic painting
under-defined, murky areas of canvas
power of disconnected gazes
charles baudelaire- gustave courbet
1849-49
charles badelaire in an armchair- nadar 1855
henri fantin-latour- manet 1867
flaneur- dwaddler, idler, bourgeoisie figure,
decoder of aesthetic details
emile zola- manet
1867
awareness of print culture of japan
reproduction of olympia on wall
japanese screen behind the man

a bar at the folies bergere- manet
c. 1882
the mirror/reflection is off
implies that viewer is the man reflected in mirror
inscrutable/sad face
woman at bar is a real woman named suzon
oranges imply that bar-maid is a prostitute
"badness" of painting is a choice to add to our sense of unease
COMPARED TO:
bal du moulin de la galette- auguste renoir
1876
lightness, laughter
_________________________________________
woman w a parasol- constantin guys
1860
rain, steam speed- j.m.w. turner
proto-impressionism
1844
inspired by transformations of industrial revolution
train exploding through the scene
paris before haussmannization
architectural transformations
georges-eugene haussmann
paris after haussmannization
1853-70
widening of boulevards, building new parks, street lights, new water/sewer systems
le bon marche
first modern department store
founded 1852 in paris
becomes public, commercial place to be/be seen

No comments:

Post a Comment